Support #301
Editorial notes: Unit-Owner-Organisation-Text
Status: | New | Start date: | 11/15/2016 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Normal | Due date: | ||
Assignee: | - | % Done: | 0% | |
Category: | Documentation | |||
Target version: | - | |||
Milestones: |
Description
xpath: /DataSets/DataSet/Units/Unit/Owner/Organisation/Name/Representation/Text
content: Label text in a specific language representing the organisation of the legal owner of the unit record.
editorial notes: So far, for these pages I have been using the term "unit". Should it be "unit record" or something else? Here, we should speak of Unit record; the same is true for the IPR Statements (next item in the schema diagram). I thought I got these things more or less right in the explanations on the unit-level, but found some exeptions (will change in the schema, too): The following should be "unit record" instead of Unit:
Unit Content Contacts, .. subtypes of the unit (2 cases), Associations, Assemblages. The following should be "unit" instead of Sampling Unit (a term not to be used): Gathering. The following are correctly termed Unit: Source Reference, Unit References, Identifications, Kind Of Unit, Multi Media Object, Named Collection Or Surveys, Measurements Or Facts, Sex, Age, Sequences.
History
#1 Updated by D. Fichtmüller almost 8 years ago
- Project changed from ABCD 3.0 Project to ABCD
- Description updated (diff)
- Category set to Documentation
#2 Updated by L. Lertsutham almost 8 years ago
- Subject changed from Editorial notes: Text to Editorial notes: Unit-Owner-Organisation-Text
- Description updated (diff)