Support #298
Editorial notes: Unit
Status: | New | Start date: | 11/15/2016 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Normal | Due date: | ||
Assignee: | - | % Done: | 0% | |
Category: | Documentation | |||
Target version: | - | |||
Milestones: |
Description
xpath: /DataSets/DataSet/Units/Unit
content: A container for all data referring to a unit (specimen or observation record).
Editorial notes: Is the group for this element 'container'? Yes, it is. Indeed, I think we need two subgroups for Container: one for the repeatable elements, and one for the structural containers (like this one). I will further discuss this on the Group page on the wiki.
History
#1 Updated by D. Fichtmüller almost 8 years ago
- Project changed from ABCD 3.0 Project to ABCD
- Category set to Documentation
What is the action item here: should we start using different words for the two different kinds of containers (the ones containing one repeatable element and the ones containing several different elements), should we mark the 137 repeatable elements in ABCD in the TDWG Terms Wiki in a special way and/or should we clean the editorial note on the Unit element (already done)?
#2 Updated by L. Lertsutham almost 8 years ago
- Description updated (diff)